From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flanning v. Baker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION
Sep 7, 2016
Case No. 5:12cv337-MW/CJK (N.D. Fla. Sep. 7, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 5:12cv337-MW/CJK

09-07-2016

VERNON FLANNING, SR., Plaintiff, v. H. BAKER, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 126, and has also reviewed de novo Plaintiff's objections to the report and recommendation, ECF No. 127. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted, over Plaintiff's objections, as this Court's opinion. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 111, is DENIED. This case is remanded to the Magistrate Judge for further pretrial proceedings on Plaintiff's individual capacity Eighth Amendment claims against Defendant Baker.

SO ORDERED on September 7, 2016.

s/ Mark E. Walker

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Flanning v. Baker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION
Sep 7, 2016
Case No. 5:12cv337-MW/CJK (N.D. Fla. Sep. 7, 2016)
Case details for

Flanning v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:VERNON FLANNING, SR., Plaintiff, v. H. BAKER, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION

Date published: Sep 7, 2016

Citations

Case No. 5:12cv337-MW/CJK (N.D. Fla. Sep. 7, 2016)

Citing Cases

Hoffmann v. McCray

On the other hand, courts have recognized that broken bones and a concussion may constitute more than de…