From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flanigan v. Panaguiten

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 17, 2011
411 F. App'x 604 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 10-6416.

Submitted: February 10, 2011.

Decided: February 17, 2011.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:08-cv-00169-MSD-TEM).

Michael Brunell Flanigan, Appellant Pro Se. George Maralan Kelley, III, Assistant United States Attorney, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Michael Brunell Flanigan appeals the district court's order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Flanigan's motion to supplement the record, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Flanigan v. Panagwiten, No. 2:08-cv-00169-MSD-TEM (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 2, 2010 entered Feb. 3, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Flanigan v. Panaguiten

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 17, 2011
411 F. App'x 604 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Flanigan v. Panaguiten

Case Details

Full title:Michael Brunell FLANIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Elizabeth PANAGUITEN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Feb 17, 2011

Citations

411 F. App'x 604 (4th Cir. 2011)