From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flamily v. City of Orlando

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 16, 2009
14 So. 3d 254 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. 1D04-2453.

July 16, 2009.

An appeal from Judge of Compensation Claims. David W. Langham, Judge.

Geoffrey Bichler of Bichler Kelley, P.A., Winter Park, for Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

Danni Lynn Germano, Michael Broussard and Barbara Eagan of Broussard, Cullen, DeGailler Eagan, P.A., Orlando, for Appellees/Cross-Appellants.


We review this case on remand from the Florida Supreme Court. See Sanders v. City of Orlando, 997 So.2d 1089 (Fla. 2008). Claimant raises one issue on appeal, while the City raises four cross-appeal issues.

Claimant argues that the JCC erred in ruling the City was not estopped from denying compensability. We conclude that the JCC did not err in rejecting Claimant's estoppel argument. Further, we affirm the issues raised on cross-appeal without discussion.

The JCC's final order is AFFIRMED.

HAWKES, C.J., KAHN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Flamily v. City of Orlando

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 16, 2009
14 So. 3d 254 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

Flamily v. City of Orlando

Case Details

Full title:Robert FLAMILY, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. CITY OF ORLANDO and City of…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jul 16, 2009

Citations

14 So. 3d 254 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)