From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flake v. Schrader-Bridgeport International, Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, at Nashville
Mar 18, 2010
NO. 3:07-0925, NO. 3:07-0926, NO. 3:07-0927 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 18, 2010)

Opinion

NO. 3:07-0925, NO. 3:07-0926, NO. 3:07-0927.

March 18, 2010


ORDER


In accordance with the Memorandum filed herewith, the Plaintiffs' motion (Docket Entry No. 59) is DENIED as moot and the Defendant Tomkins plc's revised motions to dismiss (Docket Entry No. 46 in 3:07-925); (Docket Entry No. 62 in Case No. 3:07-926); and (Docket Entry No. 59 in Case No. 3:07-927) are GRANTED and Plaintiffs' claims against Tomkins plc are DISMISSED for lack of personal jurisdiction of Tomkins plc. The Clerk shall enter this Order and accompanying Memorandum in each of the above-styled actions.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Flake v. Schrader-Bridgeport International, Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, at Nashville
Mar 18, 2010
NO. 3:07-0925, NO. 3:07-0926, NO. 3:07-0927 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 18, 2010)
Case details for

Flake v. Schrader-Bridgeport International, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RAY FLAKE and KATHY FLAKE, Plaintiffs, v. SCHRADER-BRIDGEPORT…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, at Nashville

Date published: Mar 18, 2010

Citations

NO. 3:07-0925, NO. 3:07-0926, NO. 3:07-0927 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 18, 2010)

Citing Cases

Flake v. Schrader-Bridgeport Int'l, Inc.

Tomkins argued that, as a holding company, it merely bought and sold businesses from its London, England,…

UnitedHealthcare of Fla., Inc. v. Am. Renal Assocs. Holdings, Inc.

Putting aside the speculative nature of Plaintiffs' arguments, the Court notes that the mere presence of…