From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flagg v. Wickham

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Apr 19, 2017
No. 70886 (Nev. App. Apr. 19, 2017)

Opinion

No. 70886

04-19-2017

JONATHAN PAUL FLAGG, Appellant, v. HAROLD WICKHAM, WARDEN, WARM SPRINGS CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Respondent.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Appellant Jonathan Paul Flagg appeals from an order of the district court dismissing a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. First Judicial District Court, Carson City; James E. Wilson, Judge.

This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument. NRAP 34(f)(3).

Flagg argues the district court erred in denying his May 4, 2016, petition. In his petition, Caldwell first claimed the Nevada Department of Corrections (NDOC) improperly declined to apply his credits toward his minimum term. The district court concluded Flagg was not entitled to relief because he was convicted of a category B felony, committed the offense in 2011, and for those reasons, the NDOC may only apply Flagg's credits toward his maximum terms pursuant to NRS 209.4465(8). Given these circumstances, we conclude the district court did not err in denying this claim.

The record demonstrates Flagg was convicted of child abuse and neglect causing substantial bodily or mental harm. See NRS 200.508(1)(a)(2). --------

Next, Flagg argues the district court erred by denying his petition without allowing him to oppose the State's motion to dismiss. This claim lacks merit. The State filed its motion to dismiss Flagg's petition on June 10, 2010. Pursuant to NRS 34.750(4), Flagg had 15 days after service of the State's motion within which to file his response, yet he did not file an opposition within that time frame. Accordingly, the district court did not err in dismissing Flagg's petition.

Finally, Flagg argues failure to apply his credits toward his minimum term violates his equal protection rights and is an ex post facto violation. However, Flagg did not raise these claims in his petition before the district court and we decline to consider them in the first instance. See McNelton v. State, 115 Nev. 396, 416, 990 P.2d 1263, 1276 (1999). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Silver /s/_________, J.
Tao /s/_________, J.
Gibbons cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge

Jonathan Paul Flagg

Attorney General/Carson City

Carson City Clerk


Summaries of

Flagg v. Wickham

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Apr 19, 2017
No. 70886 (Nev. App. Apr. 19, 2017)
Case details for

Flagg v. Wickham

Case Details

Full title:JONATHAN PAUL FLAGG, Appellant, v. HAROLD WICKHAM, WARDEN, WARM SPRINGS…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Apr 19, 2017

Citations

No. 70886 (Nev. App. Apr. 19, 2017)