From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flaacke v. Peck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1925
212 App. Div. 883 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)

Opinion

February, 1925.


Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. It is unnecessary for plaintiff to examine defendant in order to obtain information upon which to frame his complaint, as the only information which he lacks is the exact amount of the recovery to be demanded. ( Newman v. Potter, 201 App. Div. 335.) Kelly, P.J., Rich, Jaycox, Kelby and Young, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Flaacke v. Peck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1925
212 App. Div. 883 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)
Case details for

Flaacke v. Peck

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE W. FLAACKE, as Receiver of COLUMBIA HOSIERY COMPANY, Respondent, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1925

Citations

212 App. Div. 883 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)

Citing Cases

Hayden v. Gold Seal Products Co.

( Teall v. Roeser, supra, 373.) The case of Flaacke v. Peck ( 212 A.D. 883) and other similar cases, in which…