From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fla. Glass Mirror v. Economy King

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 17, 1978
353 So. 2d 596 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

Opinion

No. 76-2586.

December 13, 1977. Rehearing Denied January 17, 1978.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Orange County, George N. Diamantis, J.

Robert B. Worman of Waterhouse Worman, Orlando, for appellant.

Robert G. Murrell of Sam E. Murrell Sons, Orlando, for Appellee-Economy King Equipment Co.


We have considered the issues raised by the appellant and cross-appellant in this mechanic's lien foreclosure case and find no reversible error. We also grant appellee's motion for attorney's fees.

The award of attorney's fees merits discussion. Section 713.29, Florida Statutes (1975), provides for recovery of attorney's fees by the prevailing party in any action brought to enforce a mechanic's lien. The Supreme Court in Sunbeam Enterprises, Inc. v. Upthegrove, 316 So.2d 34 (Fla. 1975), held that Section 713.29 referred only to attorney's fees at the trial level and did not provide for the allowance of such fees on appeal. Since that time the Legislature has enacted an amended version of Section 59.46, Florida Statutes, which took effect on October 1, 1977. (Chapter 77-76, Laws of Florida.)

In the absence of an expressed contrary intent, any provision of statute or contract entered into after October 1, 1977, providing for the payment of attorney's fees to the prevailing party, shall be construed to include the payment of attorney's fees to the prevailing party on appeal. Section 59.46(1), Florida Statutes (1977)

We conclude that the phrase, "entered into after October 1, 1977," refers only to contracts and has no bearing on the time of enactment of statutes. We therefore hold that Section 713.29 when construed in the light of Section 59.46 now permits recovery of reasonable attorney's fees by the prevailing party on appeal.

Because the amended version of Section 59.46 took effect on October 1, 1977, and this court's determination of this appeal occurred after that date, the appellee, as the prevailing party, is entitled to the payment of reasonable attorney's fees on appeal. The law in effect at the time of appellate disposition is to be applied. Guth v. Guth, 346 So.2d 81 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).

Affirmed and remanded to the trial court for the determination and award of reasonable attorney's fees to appellee as the prevailing party on appeal.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

DOWNEY and LETTS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fla. Glass Mirror v. Economy King

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 17, 1978
353 So. 2d 596 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)
Case details for

Fla. Glass Mirror v. Economy King

Case Details

Full title:FLORIDA GLASS MIRROR COMPANY OF ORLANDO, INC., APPELLANT, v. ECONOMY KING…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jan 17, 1978

Citations

353 So. 2d 596 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

Citing Cases

Ship Shape v. Taylor

Therefore, the claimant argues that since this statute was in effect during the time of the appellate…

WALKER v. SENN

Both the note and mortgage provided for attorney's fees, as well as did the contract for sale between the…