From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fla. Dep't of Revenue v. Van Edwards

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Apr 13, 2017
214 So. 3d 800 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1D16–3160

04-13-2017

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and Elsey Teresa Flores, Appellants, v. Sergio VAN EDWARDS, Appellee.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellant. No appearance for Appellee.


Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We hold that the Division of Administrative Hearings had subject matter jurisdiction to enter an order of child support. See Dep't of Revenue v. Graczyk , 206 So.3d 157, 161 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) ("Section 409.2563 confers concurrent jurisdiction on DOR/DOAH to establish child support obligations when there is no court order of support .") (emphasis added). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the Administrative Law Judge to order such child support as is appropriate.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ROWE, OSTERHAUS, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Fla. Dep't of Revenue v. Van Edwards

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Apr 13, 2017
214 So. 3d 800 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

Fla. Dep't of Revenue v. Van Edwards

Case Details

Full title:FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and ELSEY TERESA FLORES, Appellants, v…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Apr 13, 2017

Citations

214 So. 3d 800 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Citing Cases

State v. Murillo

Because there was no court order of support in effect, and Appellee had not timely opted out of the…