Fla. Bar v. Herman

1 Citing case

  1. Florida Bar v. Herman

    8 So. 3d 1100 (Fla. 2009)   Cited 16 times
    Finding a violation of rule 4–1.8 where the lawyer invested in a company in direct competition with his client's corporation

    The suspension will be effective, nunc pro tunc, February 7, 2009, the effective date of the discipline that this Court imposed in its January 8, 2009, order. Fla. Bar v. Herman, No. SC07-363, 1 So.3d 173, 2009 WL 55936 (Fla. Jan. 8, 2009) (unpublished order). As Herman is currently suspended, he does not need thirty days to close out his practice and protect the interests of existing clients.