From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fla. Bar v. Heaton

Supreme Court of Florida.
Sep 1, 2015
177 So. 3d 1273 (Fla. 2015)

Opinion

No. SC15–1294.

09-01-2015

THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant(s) v. Melissa A. HEATON, Respondent(s).


Opinion

This is before the Court on The Florida Bar's Petition for Contempt and Order to Show Cause.

The Court having issued its Order to Show Cause to respondent and respondent having failed to file a response to said Order to Show Cause,

IT IS ORDERED that The Florida Bar's petition is granted and respondent is held in contempt of this Court. As a sanction, respondent is suspended from the practice of law effective thirty days from the date of this order so that respondent can close out her practice and protect the interests of existing clients. Respondent shall remain suspended until she fully responds in writing to the official Bar inquiry contained in “Exhibit 1” of the petition, and until further order of this Court. If respondent notifies this Court in writing that she is no longer practicing and does not need the thirty days to protect existing clients, this Court will enter an order making the suspension effective immediately. Respondent shall fully comply with Rule Regulating the Florida Bar 3–5.1(h). In addition, respondent shall accept no new business from the date this order is filed until she is reinstated. Once the suspension takes effect, respondent shall remain suspended until further order of this Court.

Not final until time expires to file motion for rehearing, and if filed, determined. The filing of a motion for rehearing shall not alter the effective date of this suspension.

LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fla. Bar v. Heaton

Supreme Court of Florida.
Sep 1, 2015
177 So. 3d 1273 (Fla. 2015)
Case details for

Fla. Bar v. Heaton

Case Details

Full title:THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant(s) v. Melissa A. HEATON, Respondent(s).

Court:Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: Sep 1, 2015

Citations

177 So. 3d 1273 (Fla. 2015)
2015 WL 5124199