From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fixman v. Fixman

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 16, 2013
102 A.D.3d 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-01-16

In the Matter of Adrian FIXMAN, appellant, v. Melvin FIXMAN, respondent.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Pamela Seider Dolgow and Suzanne K. Colt of counsel), for appellant. Scott H. Siller, Greenvale, N.Y. (Arthur DiBerardino of counsel), for respondent.


Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Pamela Seider Dolgow and Suzanne K. Colt of counsel), for appellant. Scott H. Siller, Greenvale, N.Y. (Arthur DiBerardino of counsel), for respondent.

In a child support proceeding pursuant to the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (Family Ct. Act art. 5–B), the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Richroath, J.), dated November 22, 2011, which denied her objection to an order of the same court (Blaustein, S.M.), dated March 30, 2009, which failed to award child support arrears.

ORDERED that the order dated November 22, 2011, is affirmed, with costs.

The petitioner contends that the Family Court erred in failing to award child support arrears which were allegedly due and owing pursuant to a pendente lite order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County. We disagree. Where, as here, a court fails to allocate specific amounts for maintenance and child support, the proper action is for the matter to be redetermined by the court that issued the order ( see Cohen v. Cohen, 104 A.D.2d 841, 845, 480 N.Y.S.2d 358;Jerkovich v. Jerkovich, 100 A.D.2d 575, 473 N.Y.S.2d 507). Thus, the Family Court, Queens County, properly declined to allocate the total amount set forth in the pendente lite order or to award arrears at this time, as the pendente lite order was not issued by it.

The petitioner's remaining contention is not properly before this Court.

MASTRO, J.P., DICKERSON, SGROI and HINDS–RADIX, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fixman v. Fixman

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 16, 2013
102 A.D.3d 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Fixman v. Fixman

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Adrian FIXMAN, appellant, v. Melvin FIXMAN, respondent.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 16, 2013

Citations

102 A.D.3d 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 207
957 N.Y.S.2d 871