From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fix v. B&B Mall Assocs., Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 10, 2014
118 A.D.3d 477 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-06-10

Mary FIX, et al., Plaintiffs–Respondents, v. B & B MALL ASSOCIATES, INC., Defendant–Appellant, The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Inc., etc., Defendant.

Burke, Gordon & Conway, White Plains (Stephane D. Martin of counsel), for appellant. Michael J. Lombardi, White Plains, for respondents.



Burke, Gordon & Conway, White Plains (Stephane D. Martin of counsel), for appellant. Michael J. Lombardi, White Plains, for respondents.
GONZALEZ, P.J., SWEENY, MOSKOWITZ, FREEDMAN, KAPNICK, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lizbeth Gonzalez, J.), entered May 15, 2013, which denied the motion of defendant B & B Mall Associates, Inc. (B & B Mall) to change venue from Bronx County to Westchester County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff Mary Fix was injured when she slipped and fell in a parking lot of a mall located in Westchester County. Plaintiffs designated venue in Bronx County on the basis of B & B Mall's principal place of business ( seeCPLR 503).

In support of its motion, B & B Mall submitted an affidavit of its president averring that its principal place of business at the relevant time was in Westchester County and that it does not maintain a place of business or office in Bronx County. The conclusory affidavit, unsupported by any documentary evidence or other showing that it had designated Westchester County as its principal office, was insufficient to establish that plaintiffs' selection of Bronx County was improper ( see Broderick v. R.Y. Mgt. Co., Inc., 13 A.D.3d 197, 786 N.Y.S.2d 484 [1st Dept.2004];Carey v. Anheuser–Busch, Inc., 63 A.D.3d 1094, 1094–1095, 882 N.Y.S.2d 456 [2d Dept.2009] ).

Even assuming that B & B Mall met its initial burden, plaintiffs submitted documentary evidence in opposition suggesting that B & B Mall has an office address in Bronx County and had designated Bronx County as its principal place of business with the state. B & B Mall's further submissions in reply did not refute that information, but included a receipt from the New York State Department of State, which also indicated that it had designated Bronx County as its principal place of business.

We have considered B & B Mall's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Fix v. B&B Mall Assocs., Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 10, 2014
118 A.D.3d 477 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Fix v. B&B Mall Assocs., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Mary FIX, et al., Plaintiffs–Respondents, v. B & B MALL ASSOCIATES, INC.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 10, 2014

Citations

118 A.D.3d 477 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
118 A.D.3d 477
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 4134

Citing Cases

Racquel Lividini, 20675/18E v. Goldstein

In any event, the plaintiff in that case relied on websites listing the location of the defendant's offices,…