From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fitzpatrick v. Fitzpatrick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 20, 1998
249 A.D.2d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

April 20, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Pagones, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the father's contention, the evidence adduced at the hearing was sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that a lawful order of the court clearly expressing an unequivocal mandate was in effect, that he had knowledge of that order, and that he wilfully disobeyed that order ( see, Matter of Department of Envtl. Protection v. Department of Envtl. Conservation, 70 N.Y.2d 233; County of Rockland v. Civil Serv. Empls. Assn., 62 N.Y.2d 11).

The father's remaining contentions lack merit.

Ritter, J.P., Sullivan, Krausman and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fitzpatrick v. Fitzpatrick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 20, 1998
249 A.D.2d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Fitzpatrick v. Fitzpatrick

Case Details

Full title:DENISE M. FITZPATRICK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM D. FITZPATRICK, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 20, 1998

Citations

249 A.D.2d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
671 N.Y.S.2d 682

Citing Cases

Corrado v. Corrado

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof conditionally awarding the…