From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fitzpatrick v. Davidson

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Feb 22, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-cv-00614-WDM-BNB (D. Colo. Feb. 22, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-cv-00614-WDM-BNB.

February 22, 2007


ORDER


This matter is before me on the Plaintiff's Motion in Opposition to the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Docs. # 30, filed 2/20/07] (the "Motion").

The plaintiff submitted a motion for partial summary judgment in his response to the defendants' motion for summary judgment. Pursuant to the local rules of practice of this court, "[a] cross motion for summary judgment shall not be included in a response brief. A cross motion shall be made in a separate motion and be subject to section A. of this rule." D.C.COLO.LCivR 56.1B.

In addition, the dispositive motion deadline expired on February 9, 2007 — eleven days before the plaintiff filed his cross motion for partial summary judgment. The plaintiff has not sought an order amending the Scheduling Order to extend this deadline. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion in Opposition to the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is STRICKEN.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall submit a response to the defendants' motion for summary judgment which complies with Local Rule 56.1B on or before March 14, 2007.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the text of the plaintiff's response shall not exceed 25 typewritten pages, double-spaced.


Summaries of

Fitzpatrick v. Davidson

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Feb 22, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-cv-00614-WDM-BNB (D. Colo. Feb. 22, 2007)
Case details for

Fitzpatrick v. Davidson

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL J. FITZPATRICK, Plaintiff, v. DURANT D. DAVIDSON, ROBERT B…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Feb 22, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-cv-00614-WDM-BNB (D. Colo. Feb. 22, 2007)