From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fitzkee v. Turner

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One
Jan 25, 1938
24 Cal.App.2d 526 (Cal. Ct. App. 1938)

Opinion

Docket No. 10306.

January 25, 1938.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Michael J. Roche, Judge. Affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Jesse A. Mueller and Russell C. Westover, Jr., for Appellant.

J.B. Zimdars and Frank G. Warren for Respondent.


THE COURT.

Plaintiff was in the employ of defendant under an agreement whereby he was to receive a sum per week and a share in the profits of a contract for the installation of the stage and stage equipment in the Memorial Opera House in San Francisco. He brought the present action to recover money alleged to be due and for an accounting. The trial court found against him and entered judgment in favor of the defendant.

[1] The plaintiff has appealed and attacks the findings as to certain items, which he claims are unsupported.

Without setting forth the evidence here it will be sufficient to say that an examination of the voluminous record shows that the testimony and other evidence with respect to these items is either conflicting or fairly subject to different inferences, and where such is the case the conclusion of the trial court will not be disturbed. ( Clopton v. Clopton, 162 Cal. 27 [ 121 P. 720]; MacDermot v. Hayes, 175 Cal. 95 [ 170 P. 616].)

No reasonable ground for reversal or modification of the judgment appears, and it is accordingly affirmed.


Summaries of

Fitzkee v. Turner

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One
Jan 25, 1938
24 Cal.App.2d 526 (Cal. Ct. App. 1938)
Case details for

Fitzkee v. Turner

Case Details

Full title:DARIEL FITZKEE, Appellant, v. FRED E. TURNER, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One

Date published: Jan 25, 1938

Citations

24 Cal.App.2d 526 (Cal. Ct. App. 1938)
75 P.2d 522