Opinion
Argued December 20, 1872
Decided December 24, 1872
George F. Danforth for the appellant.
Scott Lord for the respondents.
Per CURIAM. Opinion for affirmance
All concur, except CHURCH, Ch. J., dissenting.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Fitzhugh v. Sackett
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 24, 1872
50 N.Y. 699 (N.Y. 1872)
Summaries of
Fitzhugh v. Sackett
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 24, 1872
50 N.Y. 699 (N.Y. 1872)
Case details for
Fitzhugh v. Sackett
Case Details
Full title:DANIEL FITZHUGH et al., Respondents, v . WILLIAM H. SACKETT, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Dec 24, 1872
Citations
50 N.Y. 699 (N.Y. 1872)
Citing Cases
Van Campen v. Bruns
It appears that while Widdecombe advanced the $400, the amount was repaid to him by Bruns several days…
Abraham v. American Exchange National BankSuch action on the part of the principal constitutes a ratification of the agent's fraud. ( Carr v. National…