From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fitzhugh v. Marshall

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Mar 12, 2008
C 07-01091 RMW (PR) (N.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2008)

Opinion

C 07-01091 RMW (PR).

March 12, 2008


ORDER


GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ordered that respondent may have until March 25, 2008, to file an answer to, or responsive motion regarding, the petition for writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner may file and serve a traverse, if any, within thirty (30) days of his receipt of the answer. He may file and serve an opposition or statement of non-opposition within thirty (30) days of his receipt of a motion to dismiss, if any.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Fitzhugh v. Marshall

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Mar 12, 2008
C 07-01091 RMW (PR) (N.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2008)
Case details for

Fitzhugh v. Marshall

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH C. FITZHUGH, Petitioner, v. JOHN MARSHALL, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division

Date published: Mar 12, 2008

Citations

C 07-01091 RMW (PR) (N.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2008)