From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fitzgerald v. Red Arrow Corporation

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Nov 16, 1999
No. ED76021 (Mo. Ct. App. Nov. 16, 1999)

Opinion

No. ED76021

DATE: November 16, 1999

APPEAL FROM: LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF MISSOURI, HON. JOHN HOWARD PERCY, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE.

Harry J. Nichols, 906 Olive Street, Suite 510, St. Louis, Missouri 63101, for appellant.

Julie Morian, Assistant Attorney General, 720 Olive Street, Suite 2000, St. Louis, Missouri 63101, for respondent.

Before: Richard B. Teitelman, P.J., Clifford H. Ahrens, J., and Lawrence E. Mooney, J.



ORDER


Forrest Fitzgerald ("Employee") appeals from an Award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission which found that he has a permanent, partial disability. Employee argues on appeal that the Commission erred in determining that he is not permanently, totally disabled because this determination was against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and record on appeal and no error of law appears. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an extended opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for this decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Fitzgerald v. Red Arrow Corporation

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Nov 16, 1999
No. ED76021 (Mo. Ct. App. Nov. 16, 1999)
Case details for

Fitzgerald v. Red Arrow Corporation

Case Details

Full title:FORREST FITZGERALD, APPELLANT, v. RED ARROW CORPORATION, AND MISSOURI…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Nov 16, 1999

Citations

No. ED76021 (Mo. Ct. App. Nov. 16, 1999)