From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fitten v. Whitley

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 20, 2021
2:21-cv-00513 TLN AC PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-00513 TLN AC PS

09-20-2021

STEVEN M. FITTEN, Plaintiff, v. JOHN E. WHITLEY, Defendant.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is proceeding in this case in pro per. The proceeding has accordingly been referred to the magistrate judge by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). Plaintiff made an ex part request for a continuance of the initial scheduling conference in this case. ECF No. 10.

For good cause shown, the motion (ECF No. 10) is GRANTED and the initial scheduling conference in this case is hereby RESET to January 12, 2022 at 10:00 AM. The hearing is to be conducted by Zoom. The parties are to contact the Court Clerk at (916) 930-4199 or janderson@caed.uscourts.gov one week prior to the hearing in order to obtain the Zoom I/D and the Password. IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Fitten v. Whitley

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 20, 2021
2:21-cv-00513 TLN AC PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2021)
Case details for

Fitten v. Whitley

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN M. FITTEN, Plaintiff, v. JOHN E. WHITLEY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 20, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-00513 TLN AC PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2021)