Fiske v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.

Full title: RUTH E. FISKE, Plaintiff, v. PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC., Defendant

Court: United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division

Date published: Nov 7, 2006

Case No. 8:06-cv-1173-T-24TBM (M.D. Fla. Nov. 7, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 8:06-cv-1173-T-24TBM.

November 7, 2006

ORDER

THOMAS McCOUN III, Magistrate Judge

THIS MATTER is before the court on Defendant's Motion to Compel Initial Disclosures from Plaintiff and Memorandum in Support (Doc. 13). By its motion, Defendant seeks an Order compelling Plaintiff to provide mandatory disclosures, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a), namely, a proper damages computation and the supporting documentation. Plaintiff responds that Defendant's motion was unnecessary because she has already agreed to supplement the answers to her initial disclosures. (Doc. 14).

Accepting Plaintiff's representations as true and correct, Defendant's motion to compel (Doc. 13) is DENIED as moot.

Done and Ordered.