, this Court has limited the writ to circumstances in which: (1) “no other remedy [is] available,” Morgan, 346 U.S. at 512; (2) “sound reasons exist[ ] for failure to seek appropriate earlier relief,” id.; (3) the error is “of the most fundamental character,” id.; and (4) “adverse consequences exist from the conviction sufficient to satisfy the case or controversy requirement of Article III,” United States v. Verrusio, No. 09-64, 2017 WL 1437055, at *9 (D.D.C. Apr. 21, 2017) (citation omitted). See also United States v. Lee, 84 F.Supp.3d 7, 9 (D.D.C. 2015); Fishman v. Garland, 2023 WL 2645665, at *2 (D.D.C. Mar. 27, 2023).