From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fisher v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 12, 2000
755 So. 2d 189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 3D00-143.

Opinion filed April 12, 2000.

An appeal under Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(i) from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Ellen L. Leesfield, Judge. L.T. Nos. 92-11703 97-6565.

Carlton Fisher, in proper person.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and M. Rebecca Springer, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, JORGENSON, and GREEN, JJ.


The appellant appeals the denial of his 3.850 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The appellant argues that he was not given written notice, either at the time of or prior to the entry of his plea, of the state's intent to seek habitual offender status. The state concedes and we agree that the trial judge erred in not conducting an evidentiary hearing because the record does not conclusively refute the appellant's claim.

Reversed.


Summaries of

Fisher v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 12, 2000
755 So. 2d 189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Fisher v. State

Case Details

Full title:CARLTON FISHER, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 12, 2000

Citations

755 So. 2d 189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)