From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fisher v. Nail

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
Apr 5, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-2344 (W.D. La. Apr. 5, 2018)

Summary

discussing which claims are within the scope of a grievance

Summary of this case from Smith v. Davis

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-2344

04-05-2018

CHARLES F. FISHER, JR. v. LONNIE NAIL, ET AL.


MAGISTRATE JUDGE HORNSBY

JUDGMENT

For the reasons assigned in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and having thoroughly reviewed the record, no written objections having been filed, and concurring with the findings of the Magistrate Judge under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that Lonnie Nail's Motion for Summary Judgment (Record Document 54) is GRANTED and all claims against Nail are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All claims against all defendants have now been resolved, so this is a final judgment.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED at Shreveport, Louisiana, this the 5th day of April, 2018.

/s/_________

S. MAURICE HICKS, JR., CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Fisher v. Nail

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
Apr 5, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-2344 (W.D. La. Apr. 5, 2018)

discussing which claims are within the scope of a grievance

Summary of this case from Smith v. Davis
Case details for

Fisher v. Nail

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES F. FISHER, JR. v. LONNIE NAIL, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION

Date published: Apr 5, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-2344 (W.D. La. Apr. 5, 2018)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Davis

Davis is correct that Plaintiff's grievance alleged only that (1) Davis stared at Plaintiff and licked his…