From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fisher v. Mortg. Elec. Registration Sys. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Aug 14, 2011
Civ. No. 11-3093-CL (D. Or. Aug. 14, 2011)

Opinion

Civ. No. 11-3093-CL

08-14-2011

REBECCA FISHER and TRAVIS FISHER, Plaintiffs v. MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., ("MERS") a Delaware Corporation; RECONTRUST COMPANY N.A., ("ReconTrust") a wholly- owned subsidiary of Bank of America Corporation ("BAC") a Delaware Corporation' Defendants.


TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

FANNER, J.

Pro se plaintiffs seek an ex parte temporary restraining order to enjoin the foreclosure sale of their house. Although plaintiffs do not allege the date of the foreclosure sale in the complaint, plaintiffs do provide a notice of default and election to sell stating the house is scheduled for a foreclosure sale on August 31, 2011. (Ex. 8, April 25, 2011 Notice of Default and Election to Sell, 2.) Plaintiffs allege defendants have not complied with the legal requirements for a valid non-judicial foreclosure. Among other allegations, plaintiffs allege defendants failed to record all assignments of the trust deed in the county land records prior to initiating the foreclosure proceedings. (Compl. ¶ 22.) In Oregon, a party initiating nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings must record all assignments of the trust deed. ORS 86.735(1); Hooker v. Northwest Trustee Services, Inc., 2011 WL 2119103, *3 (D. Or. May 25) (citing Buraett v. MERS, 2010 WL 4282105, at *2 (D. Or. Oct. 20) and In re McCoy, 2011 WL 477820, at *3-4 (Bankr. D. Or. Feb. 7)). Plaintiffs allege MERS is listed as the beneficiary on the deed of trust at issue. (Compl. ¶ 4.)

Because of the alleged imminent foreclosure sale, and because the presence of MERS demonstrates a high probability that defendants did not comply with the recording requirements of the Oregon Trust Deed Act, I grant plaintiffs' request for a temporary restraining order. Defendants, and their officers, agents, etc..., and other persons in active concert or participation with defendants, who receive actual notice of this order, are restrained from conducting a foreclosure sale for the following property: 220 Newt Gulch Road, Wilderville, Oregon, 97543 from this day until Wednesday, August 31, 2011, at 5:00

p.m. This court will hold a hearing on whether to issue a preliminary injunction at 10:00 a.m. on August 31, 2011, in the James A. Redden Courthouse in Medford.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 14 day of August, 2011.

OWEN M. FANNER

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Fisher v. Mortg. Elec. Registration Sys. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Aug 14, 2011
Civ. No. 11-3093-CL (D. Or. Aug. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Fisher v. Mortg. Elec. Registration Sys. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:REBECCA FISHER and TRAVIS FISHER, Plaintiffs v. MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Aug 14, 2011

Citations

Civ. No. 11-3093-CL (D. Or. Aug. 14, 2011)