Thus, pretermitting the propriety of foreclosing argument which encourages jury nullification, we find that Morrison has not shown that he was harmed by the trial court's ruling in this case. See Fisher v. Fisher, 238 Ga. 253-254 ( 232 S.E.2d 532) (1977); Anderson v. State, 236 Ga. App. 679, 684 (5) ( 513 S.E.2d 235) (1999). Judgments affirmed. All the Justices concur, except Fletcher, P.J., Sears and Hunstein, JJ., who concur in Divisions 2 and 3 and in the judgment.
O'Kelley v. Hayes, 132 Ga. App. 134 (1b) ( 207 S.E.2d 641). No ruling will be made on this enumeration of error, except to point out that a casual examination of the charge does not disclose that it was tantamount to a direction of the verdict. Also, no such objection was made to the charge and re-charge after a suitable opportunity to object was given, although other objections were made. See Code Ann. ยง 70-207 (Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 31; 1966, pp. 493, 498; 1968, pp. 1072, 1078); Barnes v. State, 115 Ga. App. 431 (1) ( 154 S.E.2d 878); Maynard v. Readdick, 128 Ga. App. 368 (1) ( 196 S.E.2d 688); Fisher v. Fisher, 238 Ga. 253 ( 232 S.E.2d 532). Judgment affirmed. Bell, C. J., and Smith, J., concur.
places upon the seller a duty to disclose in situations where he or she has special knowledge not apparent to the buyer and is aware that the buyer is acting under a misapprehension as to facts which would be important to the buyer and would probably affect his decision. Wilhite v. Mays, [ 140 Ga. App. 816, 818(3) ( 232 S.E.2d 532) (1976), aff'd, 239 Ga. 31 ( 235 S.E.2d 532) (1977)]. . . . See also PBR Enterprises v. Perren, 243 Ga. 280(4) ( 253 S.E.2d 765) (1979); Worthy v. Holmes, [ 249 Ga. 104(2) ( 287 S.E.2d 9) (1982)].