From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fisher v. Felker

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 20, 2011
2:07-CV-02271-PMP-GWF (E.D. Cal. Jan. 20, 2011)

Opinion

2:07-CV-02271-PMP-GWF.

January 20, 2011


ORDER


Before the Court for consideration is Plaintiff Al Gene Fisher's First Amended Complaint (Doc. #13), filed on May 12, 2008. On December 17, 2010, the Honorable George Foley, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge, entered a Report of Findings and Recommendations (Doc. #59) recommending that Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Doc. #13) be dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

On December 17, 2010, Plaintiff Fisher was served with Magistrate Judge Foley's Report of Findings and Recommendation (Doc. #59) advising Plaintiff that he had 20 days to file in writing with the Clerk of Court any objections to the Report of Findings and Recommendation (Doc. #59). The time to file any objections has now expired.

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and determines that Magistrate Judge Foley's Report of Findings and Recommendation should be Affirmed.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Foley's Report of Findings and Recommendation (Doc. #59) is Affirmed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Al Gene Fisher's First Amended Complaint (Doc. #13) against Defendants Wong, Jackson, Grannis, Roche, Felker, Amero, Smith, Richardson and Chrones is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

DATED: January 19, 2011.


Summaries of

Fisher v. Felker

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 20, 2011
2:07-CV-02271-PMP-GWF (E.D. Cal. Jan. 20, 2011)
Case details for

Fisher v. Felker

Case Details

Full title:AL GENE FISHER, Plaintiff, v. T. FELKER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 20, 2011

Citations

2:07-CV-02271-PMP-GWF (E.D. Cal. Jan. 20, 2011)