From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fisher v. DataX, Ltd.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 23, 2022
2:22-cv-01657-GMN-EJY (D. Nev. Nov. 23, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01657-GMN-EJY

11-23-2022

COREY FISHER, Plaintiff, v. DATAX, LTD, Defendant.

CLARK HILL PLLC GIA N. MARINA Attorney for Defendant DataX, LTD. David H. Krieger, Esq. Shawn Miller, Esq. KRIEGER LAW GROUP, LLC Attorneys for Plaintiff


CLARK HILL PLLC

GIA N. MARINA

Attorney for Defendant DataX, LTD.

David H. Krieger, Esq.

Shawn Miller, Esq.

KRIEGER LAW GROUP, LLC

Attorneys for Plaintiff

JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DDATAX, LTD TO FILE ANSWER

SECOND REQUEST

Defendant DataX, Ltd (“DataX”) has requested an extension of time to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this matter, to which Plaintiff has no opposition. Accordingly, pursuant to LR IA 6-2, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED to by and among counsel, that DataX's time to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this action is extended from November 25, 2022 through and including December 27, 2022. The request was made by DataX so that the parties can have additional time to engage in settlement discussion, and Plaintiff approves. This stipulation is filed in good faith and not intended to cause delay.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Fisher v. DataX, Ltd.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 23, 2022
2:22-cv-01657-GMN-EJY (D. Nev. Nov. 23, 2022)
Case details for

Fisher v. DataX, Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:COREY FISHER, Plaintiff, v. DATAX, LTD, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Nov 23, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-01657-GMN-EJY (D. Nev. Nov. 23, 2022)