From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fisher v. DataX, Ltd.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 21, 2022
2:22-cv-01657-GMN-EJY (D. Nev. Oct. 21, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01657-GMN-EJY

10-21-2022

COREY FISHER, Plaintiff, v. DATAX, LTD, Defendant.

CLARK HILL PLLC BY GIA N. MARINA ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT DATAX, LTD. DAVID H. KRIEGER, ESQ. SHAWN MILLER, ESQ. KRIEGER LAW GROUP, LLC ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF


CLARK HILL PLLC BY GIA N. MARINA ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT DATAX, LTD.

DAVID H. KRIEGER, ESQ. SHAWN MILLER, ESQ. KRIEGER LAW GROUP, LLC ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DDATAX, LTD TO FILE ANSWER

FIRST REQUEST

Defendant DataX, Ltd (“DataX”) has requested an extension of time to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this matter, to which Plaintiff has no opposition. Accordingly, pursuant to LR IA 6-2, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED to by and among counsel, that DataX's time to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this action is extended from October 25, 2022 through and including November 25, 2022. The request was made by DataX so that it can have an opportunity to collect and review its internal files pertaining to the allegations in the Complaint, and Plaintiff approves. This stipulation is filed in good faith and not intended to cause delay.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Fisher v. DataX, Ltd.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 21, 2022
2:22-cv-01657-GMN-EJY (D. Nev. Oct. 21, 2022)
Case details for

Fisher v. DataX, Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:COREY FISHER, Plaintiff, v. DATAX, LTD, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 21, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-01657-GMN-EJY (D. Nev. Oct. 21, 2022)