From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fisher v. City of Modesto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRIC T OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 19, 2011
CASE NO.: 1:10-cv-01029 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 1:10-cv-01029

10-19-2011

RANDI FISHER, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MODESTO, a municipal corporation, HORACIO RUIZ, a police officer, MICHAEL HARDAN, police chief, and Does 1 through 20 inclusive, Defendants.

John L. Burris, Esq. Steven R. Yourke, Esq . Attorneys for plaintiff RANDI FISHER Office of the City Attorney City of Modesto James Francis Wilson Attorneys for Defendants City of Modesto and Michael Hardan Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson Kimberly E. Colwell Attorneys for Defendant Horacio Ruiz


LAW OFFICES OF JOHN BURRIS

JOHN L. BURRIS, ESQ (SBN 69888)

STEVEN R. YOURKE (SBN 118506)

Attorneys for Plaintiff

RANDI FISHER

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

AND ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff Randi Fisher and the City of Modesto, as well as all individually named defendants employed by the City of Modesto at or during the time of the allegations contained in the First Amended Complaint in this action (specifically including, but not limited to, defendant-employees Chief Michael Hardan and Horacio Ruiz), that the First Amended Complaint, including all claims and affirmative defenses, are hereby dismissed by Plaintiff with prejudice.

The parties have agreed to a settlement of the above captioned case through private mediation and the agreed consideration for said settlement has been delivered over to Plaintiff Randi Fisher.

Based upon the foregoing, the parties stipulate and request that a dismissal with prejudice should be entered at this time.

Each party will bear his or her own costs and attorneys' fees.

LAW OFFICE OF JOHN BURRIS

John L. Burris, Esq.

Steven R. Yourke, Esq.

Attorneys for plaintiff

RANDI FISHER

Office of the City Attorney

City of Modesto

James Francis Wilson

Attorneys for Defendants

City of Modesto and Michael Hardan

Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver &

Wilson

Kimberly E. Colwell

Attorneys for Defendant

Horacio Ruiz

ORDER

All of plaintiff's claims in the First Amended Complaint against the City of Modesto and all defendant-employees of the City of Modesto are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Each party will bear his or her own costs and attorneys' fees. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ____


Summaries of

Fisher v. City of Modesto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRIC T OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 19, 2011
CASE NO.: 1:10-cv-01029 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)
Case details for

Fisher v. City of Modesto

Case Details

Full title:RANDI FISHER, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MODESTO, a municipal corporation…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRIC T OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 19, 2011

Citations

CASE NO.: 1:10-cv-01029 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)