From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fisher v. BioZone Pharms., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
May 13, 2013
No. C 12-03716 WHA (LB) (N.D. Cal. May. 13, 2013)

Opinion

No. C 12-03716 WHA (LB)

05-13-2013

DANIEL FISHER, Plaintiff(s), v. BIOZONE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ET AL., Defendant(s).


ORDER REGARDING CHECK

The parties recently notified the court that they wanted the court to hold for safekeeping a check made out directly to Mr. Fisher. To do that, the court needs to issue an order directing the clerk of the court to retain the check in the court's vault until further order of the court. To make sure that everyone agrees with the process, they should file a stipulation setting forth the process they contemplate. Probably it is better that the check be returned to Defendants rather than having the clerk's office destroy it. If that is the case, then the check can be delivered here with an addressed, pre-paid Express Mail envelope for the return of the check. Again, the process should be set forth fully in the parties' stipulation.

The stipulation should contain a proposed order with language to the effect of, "pursuant to the parties' stipulation, the court directs the Clerk of the Court to hold the check dated _____from ____ in the amount of $___ made out to ___ and the accompanying addressed, pre-paid Federal Express Overnight envelope in the Clerk's vault pending further order of the court authorizing release of the check to ___ via overnight delivery."

Then, when the parties are ready to have the check sent back to Defendants, they should submit a similar stipulated order to the effect of, "pursuant to the parties' request, the clerk of the court shall release the $___ check made out to ___________ that previously was deposited with the court by sending it by overnight delivery to ___________. A self-addressed, paid Federal Express Overnight envelope was provided previously for this purpose."

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

LAUREL BEELER

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Fisher v. BioZone Pharms., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
May 13, 2013
No. C 12-03716 WHA (LB) (N.D. Cal. May. 13, 2013)
Case details for

Fisher v. BioZone Pharms., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL FISHER, Plaintiff(s), v. BIOZONE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ET AL.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: May 13, 2013

Citations

No. C 12-03716 WHA (LB) (N.D. Cal. May. 13, 2013)