From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fisher v. Bennett

Supreme Court, New York Special Term
Aug 1, 1897
21 Misc. 178 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1897)

Opinion

August, 1897.

Abner C. Thomas, for plaintiff.

Leventritt Nathan, for defendant.


Since the amendment of 1893 to section 2718 of the Code of Civil Procedure the referee has power to award costs against an executor on a claim referred and judgment is entered on the report of the referee. Although section 1836 apparently gives power to the court alone to award costs, it must be construed in conjunction with section 2718. Whitcomb v. Whitcomb, 92 Hun, 446; Winne v. Hills, 91 id. 93; Niles v. Crocker, 88 id. 314, 315; Ellis v. Filon, 85 id. 489.

The merits of the original award of costs are not before this court and it must be conceded that those costs were rightly awarded. The case presented shows that it is one of those in which an additional allowance is proper if the plaintiff is entitled to costs at all. An additional allowance of $150 is, therefore, granted.


Summaries of

Fisher v. Bennett

Supreme Court, New York Special Term
Aug 1, 1897
21 Misc. 178 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1897)
Case details for

Fisher v. Bennett

Case Details

Full title:ISABELLA H. FISHER, Plaintiff, v . JESSE C. BENNETT, as Executor, etc., of…

Court:Supreme Court, New York Special Term

Date published: Aug 1, 1897

Citations

21 Misc. 178 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1897)
47 N.Y.S. 114

Citing Cases

Lamphere v. Lamphere

There are Special Term decisions, however, which seem to hold that the referee has power to fix the costs in…

Jenkinson v. Harris

It is only in a case where costs are not passed upon by the referee that an application to the court is still…