Fisher v. Adair

Full title: HILTON FISHER, Plaintiff, v. S. ADAIR, Defendant.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 24, 2012

CASE NO. 1:11-cv-609-AWI-BAM PC (E.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:11-cv-609-AWI-BAM PC

04-24-2012

HILTON FISHER, Plaintiff, v. S. ADAIR, Defendant.

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

(ECF Nos. 29, 30)

Plaintiff Hilton Fisher ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

Plaintiff filed a motion seeking the issuance of a court order directing that he be given access to the law library on March 26, 2012. (ECF No. 29.) On March 28, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which was served on Plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed thirty days. (ECF No. 30.) More than thirty days have passed and no objection has been filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations, filed March 28, 2012, is adopted in full; and
2. Plaintiff's motion for a court order filed March 26, 2012, is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________________________________

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE