From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fishencord v. Peterson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Mar 22, 1938
77 P.2d 706 (Okla. 1938)

Opinion

No. 28115.

March 22, 1938.

(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error — Statutory Provision for Notice of Intention to Appeal Mandatory.

Section 531, O. S. 1931, is mandatory, and, among other things, provides that the "the party desiring to appeal shall give notice in open court, either at the time the judgment is rendered, or within ten days thereafter, of his intentions to appeal to the Supreme Court," and an attempted appeal not in conformity with the provisions of the statute will be dismissed.

Appeal from District Court, Muskogee County; O.H.P. Brower, Judge.

Action for damages by Herman Fishencord et al. against Carr Peterson et al. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs appeal. Dismissed.

Elbert Hinds and Howard S. Keagy, for plaintiffs in error.

Malcolm E. Rosser, Malcolm E. Rosser, Jr., and Fred W. Martin, for defendants in error.


The parties will be referred to as plaintiffs and defendants, as they appeared in the trial court.

Plaintiffs filed an action for damages. On the 5th day of March, 1937, the court sustained a demurrer to the amended petition and dismissed the action. No notice of intention to appeal was given until the 18th day of March, 1938. A motion to dismiss has been filed on the ground that this court is without jurisdiction of the appeal. The appeal must be dismissed. Blackmon v. Reid, 170 Okla. 122, 38 P.2d 957; Thomas v. Richey, 171 Okla. 349, 42 P.2d 489. In Thomas v. Richey, supra, we held:

"Section 531, O. S. 1931, is mandatory, and, among other things, provides that 'the party desiring to appeal shall give notice in open court, either at the time the judgment is rendered, or within ten days thereafter, of his intentions to appeal to the Supreme Court.' and an attempted appeal not in conformity with the provisions of the statute will be dismissed."

The appeal is dismissed.

BAYLESS, V. C. J., and PHELPS, CORN, GIBSON, and HURST, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fishencord v. Peterson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Mar 22, 1938
77 P.2d 706 (Okla. 1938)
Case details for

Fishencord v. Peterson

Case Details

Full title:FISHENCORD et al. v. PETERSON et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Mar 22, 1938

Citations

77 P.2d 706 (Okla. 1938)
182 Okla. 315

Citing Cases

Fishencord v. Peterson

ition consisting of three causes of action was filed by the plaintiffs in error on February 16, 1933, and…

Goodkin v. Hough

The action of the trial court in vacating the judgment for the assigned reasons constituted the vacation of a…