Summary
In Fishbain v. City of Chicago, 237 Ill. App. 631, it was held that the city had power to enact reasonable regulations in regard to the dry-cleaning business; that in passing the ordinance in question it was the intention of the City Council that it should be given effect without section 1416; and that, therefore, as the bill of complaint did not allege that the whole ordinance in question was invalid, the complainant had an adequate and complete remedy at law, and the injunction should not have been granted.
Summary of this case from Klever Shampay Karpet Kleaners v. ChicagoOpinion
Gen. No. 30,013.
Opinion filed March 23, 1925.
Injunction suit to enjoin defendants from interfering with construction of building. Injunction issued.
Appeal from interlocutory order from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Ira Ryner, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1924.
Francis X. Busch, Corporation Counsel, for appellants; Albert H. Veeder, William L. Sullivan, Thomas J. Sheehan and Barnet Hodes, Assistant Corporation Counsel, of counsel. Wilber J. McGinness, for appellee.
Reversed.