Opinion
No. 13-6551
08-23-2013
JOHN FISHBACK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS; AHNAD MURTHI, MD.; MICHAEL O'BRIAN; LABID SYAD, MD.; NAO B. ODEFLE, MD.; BARBARA NEWLON; SHERON BAUCOM, MD.; ASRESAHEGN GETACHEW, MD.; COLIN OTTEY, MD.; MAJID ARNAUT, MD.; GARY MAYNARD, Secretary; J. M. STOUFFER, Commissioner; BOBBY SHEARIN, Warden; WARDEN BISHOP; SUDAIR KATHURIA, MD.; CORIZON; UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND MEDICAL SYSTEM, Defendants - Appellees.
John Fishback, Appellant Pro Se. Indira Kavita Sharma, Jason M. St. John, SAUL EWING, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Michelle Jacquelyn Marzullo, MARKS, O'NEILL, O'BRIEN, DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C., Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:12-cv-00648-JFM) Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Fishback, Appellant Pro Se. Indira Kavita Sharma, Jason M. St. John, SAUL EWING, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Michelle Jacquelyn Marzullo, MARKS, O'NEILL, O'BRIEN, DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C., Towson, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
John Fishback appeals the district court's orders denying his motions and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Fishback v. Depuy Orthopaedics, No. 1:12-cv-00648-JFM (D. Md. Mar. 28, 2013; Mar. 21, 2013; Mar. 13, 2013; Mar. 7, 2013; Feb. 19, 2013; Sept. 17, 2012; July 31, 2012; June 26, 2012; filed Mar. 1, 2012 & entered Mar. 2, 2012). We deny Fishback's motions for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED