Opinion
October, 1906.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Williams and Nash, JJ., who dissented.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Fish v. Utica Steam and Mohawk Valley Cotton Mills
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1906
115 App. Div. 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)
Summaries of
Fish v. Utica Steam and Mohawk Valley Cotton Mills
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1906
115 App. Div. 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)
Case details for
Fish v. Utica Steam and Mohawk Valley Cotton Mills
Case Details
Full title:Rose Fish, an Infant, by John Fish, Her Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: Oct 1, 1906
Citations
115 App. Div. 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)
100 N.Y.S. 1115