From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fish v. Colvin

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Apr 18, 2014
570 F. App'x 680 (9th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 12-35882 D.C. No. 4:11-cv-0080-RKS

04-18-2014

TASHINA L. FISH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant - Appellee.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Keith Strong, Magistrate Judge, Presiding


Submitted April 10, 2014

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
--------

Seattle, Washington

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, and RAWLINSON and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Reviewing the decision of the district court de novo, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the administrative law judge's denial of disability benefits. See Hill v. Astrue, 698 F.3d 1153, 1158 (9th Cir. 2012). Although Tashina Fish suffered from a severe cognitive impairment, her back problems were not a severe physical impairment. Therefore, she retained the capacity to perform unskilled work with certain limitations.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Fish v. Colvin

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Apr 18, 2014
570 F. App'x 680 (9th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

Fish v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:TASHINA L. FISH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 18, 2014

Citations

570 F. App'x 680 (9th Cir. 2014)