From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fish v. Burge

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 26, 2008
52 A.D.3d 1141 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 503896.

June 26, 2008.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Mark Fish, Elmira, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Peters, J.P., Spain, Lahtinen, Kane and Stein, JJ.


After two small wires that were concealed with glue were found running along the floor and into petitioner's prison cell, he was charged in a misbehavior report with possession of an item in a prohibited area, possession of an unauthorized item and misuse of state property. A tier II disciplinary hearing ensued, at the conclusion of which petitioner was found guilty of all charges. That determination was administratively affirmed, prompting this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking annulment.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, authored by the correction officer who discovered the wires, is sufficient to provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Adams v Goord, 45 AD3d 940, 940-941). Further, the details of the misbehavior report were corroborated by the testimony of its author and the testimony of the other officer present when the wires were found. Petitioner's assertions that he was unaware that the wires were in his cell and that someone else placed them there created credibility issues for resolution by the Hearing Officer ( see Matter of Ubaldo v Leclaire, 46 AD3d 975, 975). To the extent preserved, petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claims that the misbehavior report was defective and the confiscated wires were not properly secured and documented, have been examined and found to be unavailing.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Fish v. Burge

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 26, 2008
52 A.D.3d 1141 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Fish v. Burge

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MARK FISH, Petitioner, v. JOHN BURGE, as Superintendent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 26, 2008

Citations

52 A.D.3d 1141 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 5848
862 N.Y.S.2d 391

Citing Cases

In re Jose Hernandez

Contrary to petitioner's contention, the correctional facility had the authority to search the envelope, as…