From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fischer v. N.Y. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 6, 2007
46 A.D.3d 1006 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 502727.

December 6, 2007.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Comptroller which denied petitioner's application for accidental disability retirement benefits.

Bartlett, McDonough, Bastone Monaghan, L.L.P., White Plains (Erin Coxen of counsel), for petitioner.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (William E. Storrs of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Mercure, Crew III, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur.


Petitioner, a police lieutenant employed by the City of Newburgh Police Department in Orange County, allegedly sustained disabling injuries to his back after he fell on uneven pavement while searching for a prowler at night in an unlit backyard overgrown with vegetation. Petitioner's application for accidental disability retirement benefits was denied on the ground that the incident causing his injuries was not an accident within the meaning of Retirement and Social Security Law § 363. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

It is well settled that "`an injury that occurs without an unexpected event, as the result of activity undertaken in the performance of ordinary employment duties (considered in view of the particular employment in question) is not an accidental injury'" ( Matter of Pryor v Hevesi, 14 AD3d 776, 776, quoting Matter of Cadiz v McCall, 236 AD2d 766, 766). At the time of his injury, petitioner was engaged in ordinary police work in searching for a prowler. In performing such work, exposure to various conditions, including uneven pavement, is an inherent risk that would ordinarily be anticipated ( see Matter of McCabe v Hevesi, 38 AD3d 1035, 1036; Matter of Coon v New York State Comptroller, 30 AD3d 884, 885, lv denied 7 NY3d 717; Matter of Penkalski v McCall, 292 AD2d 735, 736). Although petitioner contends that, as a lieutenant, his duties were supervisory in nature and at the time of the injury he was acting beyond the scope of his usual duties, the record establishes that assisting on emergency calls to investigate prowlers is within the ordinary duties and responsibilities of a City of Newburgh police lieutenant. Inasmuch as substantial evidence supports the determination, it will not be disturbed.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Fischer v. N.Y. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 6, 2007
46 A.D.3d 1006 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Fischer v. N.Y. State

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of GREGORY V. FISCHER, Petitioner v. NEW YORK STATE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 6, 2007

Citations

46 A.D.3d 1006 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 9659
846 N.Y.S.2d 482

Citing Cases

Melendez v. N.Y. State

Following a hearing and redetermination, a Hearing Officer denied the application on the same ground and…

Roth v. Dinapoli

As we have recognized, the “pursuit of suspects is an ordinary employment duty of a police officer” (Matter…