From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fischer v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Apr 8, 2013
1:12CV392 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 8, 2013)

Opinion

1:12CV392

04-08-2013

SCOTT FISCHER, Plaintiff, v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC, Defendant.


ORDER

The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the Court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on December 28, 2012, was served on the parties in this action. Plaintiff filed objections to the Recommendation [Doc. # 22] and Defendant responded [Doc. # 23].

The Court has conducted a de novo review of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. # 7], and the Court hereby ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation granting the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. # 19].

Plaintiff has not filed a response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and has not provided any excuse that would allow the Court to find that this failure to file was excusable neglect pursuant to Local Rule 7.3(k). Plaintiff's claim is also barred by the three year statute of limitations for a product liability action. See N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-52(16).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. # 7] is GRANTED and that this action is DISMISSED.

N. Carlton Tilley , Jr.

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Fischer v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Apr 8, 2013
1:12CV392 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Fischer v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT FISCHER, Plaintiff, v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Date published: Apr 8, 2013

Citations

1:12CV392 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 8, 2013)