From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fischer v. Bank of Manhattan Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 1936
247 App. Div. 708 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

February, 1936.

Present — Martin, P.J., McAvoy, O'Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.


The amended complaint states a cause of action. The exhibits attached to the amended complaint are not so conclusive as to be determinative of the claims made by defendant. The facts with respect to the relationship of the parties should be developed at a trial. Order denying defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings dismissing the amended complaint for insufficiency unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements.


Summaries of

Fischer v. Bank of Manhattan Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 1936
247 App. Div. 708 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Fischer v. Bank of Manhattan Company

Case Details

Full title:JACK FISCHER and Another, Respondents, v. BANK OF MANHATTAN COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1936

Citations

247 App. Div. 708 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)