From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fischbeck v. Berryhil

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Sep 21, 2017
Case No. 6:16 CV 00851-JR (D. Or. Sep. 21, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 6:16 CV 00851-JR

09-21-2017

TAMMY FISCHBECK, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

Magistrate Judge Russo filed her Findings and Recommendation on August 29, 2017. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Russo's Findings and Recommendation.

Dated this 21st day of September, 2017.

/s/_________

Ann Aiken, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Fischbeck v. Berryhil

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Sep 21, 2017
Case No. 6:16 CV 00851-JR (D. Or. Sep. 21, 2017)
Case details for

Fischbeck v. Berryhil

Case Details

Full title:TAMMY FISCHBECK, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Sep 21, 2017

Citations

Case No. 6:16 CV 00851-JR (D. Or. Sep. 21, 2017)