From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Firth v. Shoemaker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 3, 2011
Civil Action No. 09-cv-00224-MSK-MJW (D. Colo. Aug. 3, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-cv-00224-MSK-MJW

08-03-2011

SCOTT FIRTH,Plaintiff, v. JONI SHOEMAKER, PEGGY HEIL, JOE STOMMEL, BURL McCULLAR, SAMUEL DUNLAP, CHRISTINE TYLER, DWIGHT MARTINEZ, PAT MOSHURE, JACULYN MAUS, LENNY WOODSON, and TINA VALDEZ, Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

Substantially for the reasons stated in the defendants' response (Docket No. 153), it is hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Motion to Introduce Intervention (Docket No. 145) is denied. Intervention of right is not warranted. There has been no showing that Mr. Troke is "so situated that disposing of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede the movan'ts ability to protects [his] interest . . . ." See Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(a). Furthermore, intervention at this late date would prejudice defendants, would introduce additional issues that do not directly concern plaintiff's termination from the SOTMP, and would unduly delay the disposition in this case.


Summaries of

Firth v. Shoemaker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 3, 2011
Civil Action No. 09-cv-00224-MSK-MJW (D. Colo. Aug. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Firth v. Shoemaker

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT FIRTH,Plaintiff, v. JONI SHOEMAKER, PEGGY HEIL, JOE STOMMEL, BURL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Aug 3, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-cv-00224-MSK-MJW (D. Colo. Aug. 3, 2011)