Opinion
Submitted March 25, 1925 —
Decided May 18, 1925.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 2 N.J. Mis. R. 478.
For the appellant, Robert Peacock.
For the respondent, Francis J. Smith.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, KALISCH, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.