From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Firtag v. Gendleman

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Jun 6, 1957
152 F. Supp. 226 (D.D.C. 1957)

Opinion

Civ. A. No. 2370-55.

June 6, 1957.

Earl H. Davis, of Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs.

Justin L. Edgerton, of Washington, D.C., for defendants.


This is a motion to retax costs. The Court is of the opinion that the following items are not taxable as costs:

Fees of expert witnesses in excess of the statutory witness fees.

Cost of copies of depositions obtained for counsel's use as distinguished from the cost of the original deposition.

Cost of a transcript of the proceedings at the trial, be it an entire transcript or partial. It is a taxable item only if the transcript is ordered by the court. It is not taxable if counsel orders it for his own use.

In view of these considerations the action of the clerk in disallowing the above items is sustained and the motion to retax costs is denied.


Summaries of

Firtag v. Gendleman

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Jun 6, 1957
152 F. Supp. 226 (D.D.C. 1957)
Case details for

Firtag v. Gendleman

Case Details

Full title:Gabriel FIRTAG et ux., Plaintiffs, v. Maurice J. GENDLEMAN, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Jun 6, 1957

Citations

152 F. Supp. 226 (D.D.C. 1957)

Citing Cases

Bowman v. West Disinfecting Co.

The transcript is excessively long. See Firtag v. Gendleman, D.C.D.C.1957, 152 F.Supp. 226; Republic Mach.…

Prashker v. Beech Aircraft Corp.

Since express provision is made for the filing of the original and its availability to the defendant being…