Summary
concluding that Proposition 47 "does not undermine a prior conviction's felony-status for purposes of § 841"
Summary of this case from United States v. LondonOpinion
No. 12-17241 No. 12-17327 No. 13-16164 No. 13-16180
09-22-2016
Brian Sirower, Attorney, Quarles & Brady LLP, Phoenix, AZ, Scott R. Goldberg, Esquire, Mark C. Hudson, Esquire, Dale Schian, Attorneys, Schian Walker, P.L.C., Phoenix, AZ, Edward King Poor, Attorney, Quarles & Brady LLP, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff–Appellant. Scott B. Cohen, David William Engelman, Bradley D. Pack, Patrick Clisham, Attorneys, Engelman Berger, PC, Phoenix, AZ, Susan Freeman, Attorney, Justin Henderson, Henk Taylor, Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant–Appellee.
Brian Sirower, Attorney, Quarles & Brady LLP, Phoenix, AZ, Scott R. Goldberg, Esquire, Mark C. Hudson, Esquire, Dale Schian, Attorneys, Schian Walker, P.L.C., Phoenix, AZ, Edward King Poor, Attorney, Quarles & Brady LLP, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff–Appellant.
Scott B. Cohen, David William Engelman, Bradley D. Pack, Patrick Clisham, Attorneys, Engelman Berger, PC, Phoenix, AZ, Susan Freeman, Attorney, Justin Henderson, Henk Taylor, Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant–Appellee.
ORDER
THOMAS, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that these cases be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.