From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

First National Bank of Lagrange v. U.S.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
Jan 29, 2008
Case Nos. 06 C 4768, 07 C 2820 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 29, 2008)

Opinion

Case Nos. 06 C 4768, 07 C 2820.

January 29, 2008


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


Before the Court is Defendant United States's (hereinafter, "United States") Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Plaintiff's Motion to Allow Limited Discovery (No. 06 C 4768).

For the reasons given below, Defendant's Motion is granted and Plaintiff's motion is denied. The consolidated case against the remaining defendant, West Suburban Medical Center (No. 06 C 4768), is remanded back to the Circuit Court of Cook County.

I. BACKGROUND

On December 16, 2005, Plaintiff Montes (hereinafter, "Montes"), filed an action in state court against West Suburban Hospital Medical Center, Inc. (hereinafter, "West Suburban"), and Dr. Tony Hampton (hereinafter, "Hampton"), alleging that the acts and omissions of various health care providers between September 2-4, 2002 caused him injuries at his birth. The case was removed to this court on September 1, 2006, at which time the United States was substituted for Dr. Hampton pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 233 and 28 U.S.C. § 2679(d)(1). With the United States as a defendant, the claim was deemed an action under the Federal Tort Claims Act (the "FTCA"). On November 14, 2006, Montes filed an administrative claim with the Department of Health and Human Services ("DHS"). The agency denied the claim, and Montes filed the instant case.

II. DISCUSSION

An action under the FTCA shall not be instituted "unless the claimant shall have first presented the claim to the appropriate Federal agency and his claim shall have been finally denied by the agency in writing and sent by certified or registered mail." 28 U.S.C. § 2675(a). Moreover, "[a] tort claim against the United States shall be forever barred unless it is presented in writing to the appropriate Federal agency within two years after such claim accrues." 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b).

The statute of limitations "begins to run on the date when the plaintiff discovers that he has been injured by an act or omission attributable to the defendant." Goodhand v. U.S., 40 F.3d 209, 214 (7th Cir. 1994); see U.S. v. Kubrick, 444 U.S. Ill, 122-24 (1979). Here, Montes's cause of action accrued on the date of his birth, September 4, 2002, because his parents knew that he was injured by acts or omissions attributable to Dr. Hampton and various other employees of West Suburban Medical Center. See Compl. ¶¶ 3, 5, 9-12; Goodhand, 40 F.3d at 212.

Because Montes did not file his administrative claim until November 14, 2006, more than four years after his claim accrued, his claim against the United States is "forever barred." 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b).

Furthermore, "the FTCA's statute of limitations is not tolled during the period of a putative plaintiff's minority," McCall ex rel. Estate of Bess v. U.S., 310 F.3d 984, 988 (7th Cir. 2002), and the FTCA's savings provision does not apply here, see 28 U.S.C. § 2679(d)(5).

III. CONCLUSION

For the reasons stated herein, Defendant United States's Motion to Dismiss is Granted. Plaintiff's Motion to Allow Limited Discovery is Denied, since the proposed discovery is irrelevant to the issue of the limitations period. The consolidated case (No. 06 C 4768) is remanded back to the Circuit Court of Cook County.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

First National Bank of Lagrange v. U.S.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
Jan 29, 2008
Case Nos. 06 C 4768, 07 C 2820 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 29, 2008)
Case details for

First National Bank of Lagrange v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LaGRANGE, as Next Friend and Special Administrator…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division

Date published: Jan 29, 2008

Citations

Case Nos. 06 C 4768, 07 C 2820 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 29, 2008)