Opinion
Submitted October 27, 1939 —
Decided January 25, 1940.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is printed in 121 N.J.L. 356; 2 Atl. Rep. (2 d) 650.
For the plaintiff respondent. Samuel Tartalsky and Edward Zubalsky.
For the defendant-appellant, Samuel J. Davidson.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, BODINE, HEHER, PORTER, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, HAGUE, JJ. 8.
For reversal — THE CHANCELLOR, CASE, DONGES, HETFIELD, RAFFERTY, JJ. 5.