The only thing left to claimant is the right to pay taxes on the appropriated land and some dubious rights of a temporary nature." ( 33 Misc.2d 134, 137.) It is apparent, as a matter of computation, that the trial court valued the 2,500 acres at $700 an acre to arrive at a before value of $1,750,000. We concur in that finding.
Dillenbeck v. State of New York, 193 Misc. 542, affd. 275 App. Div. 871; Robinson v. State of New York, 3 A.D.2d 326). " The court also considered and agreed with the dicta in the decision of Clark v. State of New York ( 35 Misc.2d 577 [Court of Claims, 1962]), wherein Judge HELLER, in refusing to vacate decisions in the cases of Clark v. State of New York ( 33 Misc.2d 129 [Court of Claims, 1962]; First Nat. City Trust Co. v. State of New York, 33 Misc.2d 134 [Court of Claims, 1962]) and Thom v. State of New York ( 33 Misc.2d 402 [Court of Claims, 1962]), stated at page 579 that: "The State at any time during the trial could have submitted a limitation on the easement. It is believed that this would be in line with the reasoning as set forth in Nichols 1, Eminent Domain (vol. 3, ยง 8.2, pp. 12-13)".