First Nat. Bk., Col. v. Charles Broadway Rouss

4 Citing cases

  1. Smith v. United States

    254 F.2d 865 (6th Cir. 1958)   Cited 4 times

    In Dennison Brick Tile Co. v. Chicago Trust Co., 6 Cir., 1923, 286 F. 818, 822, upon applying the rule just stated in a situation closely analogous to that presented in the case at bar, this Court declared: "Our conclusion that the state court had exclusive jurisdiction to determine the validity of the [lien] renders a discussion of the merits of the controversy not only unnecessary, but improper." 286 F. at page 822; see also: First Nat. Bank of Columbus, Ga., v. Charles Broadway Rouss, Inc., 5 Cir., 1932, 61 F.2d 489, 492, certiorari denied, 1933, 287 U.S. 670, 53 S.Ct. 314, 77 L.Ed. 577; Davis v. Mabee, 6 Cir., 32 F.2d 502, 504, certiorari denied, 1929, 280 U.S. 580, 50 S.Ct. 33, 74 L.Ed. 630; cf. Great North Woods Club v. Raymond, 6 Cir., 1931, 54 F.2d 1017. Here the judgment of the District Court, in addition to decreeing that the tax claims against appellant Robert Smith constitutes a valid lien against the real property which is the subject of the earlier state court quiet-title action, also decrees that the tax lien is a first lien on that real property, and orders the property "be sold by the U.S. Marshal at public auction.

  2. Izen v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co.

    Civil Action H-23-2028 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 2, 2023)

    First Nat. Bank v. Charles Broadway Rouss, Inc., 61 F.2d 489, 491 (5th Cir. 1932) (quoting Farmers Loan & Trust Co., 177 U.S. at 61).

  3. 1ST NAT. CREDIT CORP. v. VON HAKE

    511 F. Supp. 634 (D. Utah 1981)   Cited 10 times
    Commenting on the semantic differences between in rem and quasi-in-rem labels and holding that the Utah statutory action to quiet title is an action in rem, or quasi in rem

    See, e.g., Boucofski v. Jacobsen, 36 Utah 165, 104 P. 117, 122 (1909). Of necessity the court must take control of the property foreclosed upon and judicially determine its disposition. See First National Bank of Columbus v. Charles Broadway Rouss, Inc., 61 F.2d 489 (5th Cir. 1932), cert. denied, 287 U.S. 670, 53 S.Ct. 314, 77 L.Ed. 577 (1933). This the Utah court did, granting a judgment of foreclosure decreeing the sale of the Seeps Ranch property, which sale was subsequently completed.

  4. Aysseh v. Lawn

    180 N.J. Super. 391 (Ch. Div. 1981)   Cited 5 times

    The foreclosure action commenced in this court is an in rem action. First National Bank of Columbus v. Charles Broadway Rouss, Inc., 61 F.2d 489 (5 Cir. 1932), cert. den. 287 U.S. 670, 53 S.Ct. 314, 77 L.Ed. 577 (1933); 1A Moore's Federal Practice (2 ed. 1980), § 0.214 at 2503. No federal suit has been commenced.